Mormon Poppycock

Anyone familiar with biblical language and the timeline of the New Testament events will have problems with the Book of Mormon.  In 1 Nephi chapter 13, which supposedly covers a time period between B.C. 600 and 592, we read of references to a great abominable church which has gone forth from the Lamb to spread the gospel.  The Greek word however where we get the word "church" was not even thought of much less used in the Bible during this time.  The Greek bible did not come into existence for several hundred years with the advent of the Septuagint LXX and the word gospel did not come about until the time of Jesus.  The writer of the Book of Mormon is playing to a naive and ignorant audience that would likely know only King James English and have little knowledge of ancient biblical languages.  In Doctrine and Covenants 76:67 there is even mention of a church of Enoch.

Another blooper appears in Alma 46:15 which Mormonism claims occurred in B.C. 73 those that belonged to the "church" were called Christians.  The bible records the followers of Christ first being called Christians at Antioch in A.D. 42.  Yet, the Mormons claim there were Christians before Christ even appeared on the planet.  No problem, as long as you have that burning in the bosom.

Comments

  1. UnknownOctober 9, 2019 at 4:59 PM

    Islam is basically doing the same thing by bringing up talking points they claim belong to them when they hadnt even existed as an organization at that point!Islam as an Organization came ot pass much later as well! The fact Islam created as rules all the moral and legal laws Muhammed and Allah broke on a daily basis and its quite sickening! Their form of legal system is a crime in it self against humanity!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownOctober 9, 2019 at 6:51 PM

    So anyone who really reads the Book of Mormon will realize it is another testament of Jesus Christ,
    If you believe the Bible or even if you don't, there is truth and light in that book that no amount of negative comments or propaganda can overcome, open minds and hearts will feel the Spirit. Try it for yourself!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dale BrownOctober 11, 2019 at 11:42 AM

      And you can get a burning in the bosom from a spicy pizza. Try it for yourself.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mormons and the Freemason Connection

Image
This all seeing eye is on the wall above the speaker's platform in the tabernacle in St. George, Utah. With Joseph Smith being a mason there is found much masonic symbolism on early Mormon buildings.  The Salt Lake temple has the eye and the hand shake carved on the exterior for all the world to see. The beehive was borrowed from Freemasonry and is found in Mormon buildings and is a Utah state symbol.  Mormons claim Deseret is another word for beehive and wanted their kingdom to be called by that name but the U.S. government named it Utah after the Ute Indians. Notice the beehive on this Masonic apron A beehive shaped pile of stones was erected over the bones of those murdered by Mormons at the Mountain Meadows massacre 9/11 1857.  Originally the U.S. soldiers placed a cross here but in months leading up to the winter Olympics in 2002 in Utah this new monument was built for the sake of public relations. Utah Capital
Read more

Pearl of Great Deception

Image
I purchased a copy of the second printing of Dr. Walter Martin's book The Maze of Mormonism some time around 1984.  By then the Mormon church was doing their best to discredit Egyptologist Dee Jay Nelson who claimed the facsimiles in the Book of Abraham were total fiction.  Though Mr. Nelson a member of the Latter-Day Saints was chosen by the church to translate some newly found papyri, it did not turn out in their favor. When other scholars outside the church such as both Dr. John A. Wilson, and Dr. Klaus Baer (University of Chicago), as well as Professor Richard Parker (Brown University) came to about the same conclusion as Nelson, the church began screaming anti-Mormon conspiracy.  The reality became known that what Joseph Smith had claimed in his dubious translation was pure poppycock.  This was not something written by Abraham but in fact was an ordinary Egyptian funeral document dating to no earlier than 660 B.C. over a thousand years after the time of Abraham.  One facsimile
Read more